GritsforBreakfast reported last week that California may virtually abolish their youth prisons in favor of having the counties administer juvenile detention on their own. Due to a 2007 court order, California had already transfered most of their juvenile detention responsibilities to regional centers run by the counties. However, some still remain under the state’s auspices, a reality which is costing the state of California tremendous amounts of tax dollars. As a result, California’s Juvenile Justice Report published this month, entitled “Realigning Responsibilities”, recognized that California’s juvenile justice system was in need of serious reforms due to these increasing costs and recommended that California complete the transfer of responsibility from the state to the counties.

In shifting responsibility to the counties for hundreds of California’s youth offenders, the state recognized that its juvenile justice system cannot be reformed without radical change.

Though prompted by cost concerns, the realignment of responsibilities to the counties was the right policy move, one previously recommended by this Commission and others. Many counties have demonstrated that they can provide programs and treatment to youth offenders who need to turn their lives around in settings that allow them to reintegrate more successfully into their communities.

Once [the 2007 court ordered] realignment is complete, the number of youth offenders in state hands will shrink to fewer than 1,500. The annual cost of providing services to each ward, however, next year will rise to $252,000. This startling figure reflects the overhead expenses of a system built to serve a far larger population, the cost of reforms required under a court-supervised consent decree and the complex needs of these seriously troubled youth. Californians may fairly ask what they are getting for this outlay and whether other strategies can better deliver public safety and youth rehabilitation. The state has made slow, yet undeniable, progress. Still, advocates for youth offenders, frustrated by the pace of reform, have asked a court to place the juvenile justice system in receivership.

Whatever the court’s decision, the state’s costs per ward likely will increase as juvenile programming and treatment services are expanded and its crumbling facilities continue to age. The state’s master plan for renovating or replacing its juvenile facilities, promised to legislators, is long overdue. The delay may mean that the cost of bringing California’s facilities in line with current programming requirements or replacing them is unaffordable, particularly in light of the current budget deficit.

The prospect of ever-higher outlays for an ever-smaller juvenile population in state custody should prompt policy-makers to extend realignment to completion. The Commission recommends that the state begin planning now to ultimately eliminate its juvenile justice operations and create regional rehabilitative facilities for high-risk, high-need offenders to be leased to and run by the counties.

Related posts:

1. Texas Legislation Watch: The Future of The Texas Youth Commission Established in 1949, the Texas Youth Commission (TYC) is the...
2. Job Posting: Legal Researcher, Texas Supreme Court Permanent Judicial Commission for Children, Youth and Families The Supreme Court of Texas has posted a job for...

Related posts brought to you by Yet Another Related Posts Plugin.